Answer every reviewer comment, and show the editor you did.
Paste the decision letter and the reviewer reports. Your browser numbers every request and comment and checks your notes and draft for free - nothing is uploaded. A paid run then plans the revision, drafts the point-by-point responses one reviewer at a time, or audits the reply you wrote.
Each example has a saved model run, so you can see the whole page for free.
Your recent runs
What this does, and what it does not
The numbering is pattern work on what you pasted: reviewer headers such as "Reviewer #1" or "Referee 2", numbered, lettered, bulleted or "Line 45:" comments, "Major comments" and "Minor comments" sections. The decision is read only from an explicit label in the editor's part of the letter; a reviewer's own recommendation never sets it, and when there is no label the desk asks rather than guessing. Check the numbered list before you run: the model is told to answer exactly those ids.
The rules come from the source skill: reviewers are mutually blind, so each reviewer gets a standalone file with only their comments (assembled here from the letter's own wording); a missed point is treated as unclear presentation, never as the reviewer's failure; declining an experiment needs a design or scope reason, not time or money; and nothing counts as done unless your notes say so, or as verified unless the revised text is in the manuscript you pasted. Derived from the agent skill @yuan1z0825/nature-response (yuan1z0825/nature-skills, Apache-2.0). Not affiliated with any journal or publisher. The example letters are fictional.